« March 2005 | Main | May 2005 »
April 28, 2005
Google Moves into Web Analytics
Google has announced the closing of the deal with Urchin and its entry into the world of web analytics. Very interesting news since yet again we see Google follow the heavy acquisition steps of Microsoft.
MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--March 28, 2005--Google Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) today announced it has agreed to acquire Urchin Software Corporation, a San Diego, California based web analytics company.
Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.
Urchin is a web site analytics solution used by web site owners and marketers to better understand their users' experiences, optimize content and track marketing performance. Urchin tools are available as a hosted service, a software product and through large web hosting providers. These products are used by thousands of popular sites on the Internet.
Google plans to make these tools available to web site owners and marketers to better enable them to increase their advertising return on investment and make their web sites more effective.
"We want to provide web site owners and marketers with the information they need to optimize their users' experience and generate a higher return-on-investment from their advertising spending," said Jonathan Rosenberg, vice president of product management, Google. "This technology will be a valuable addition to Google's suite of advertising and publishing products."
The acquisition is subject to customary closing conditions. Google anticipates that the acquisition will close before the end of April.
Posted by Basileios at 03:49 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
April 27, 2005
Google Experiments with Ads in RSS Feeds
Longhornblogs.com has started experimenting with a new alpha service of Google Adsense in which ads are served in RSS feeds.
Is this good news? It really depends on which side you are looking at things. Feed producers (and Google) will benefit from the clicks but will advertisers be able to make a dcecent ROI out of this service? I somehow do not feel happy about the fact that RSS feeds will be spamming me with adverts.
What's next? Adsense on the moon?

Posted by Basileios at 02:53 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
April 26, 2005
Adsense Changes
Adsense comes with new additions... More ways of making (and spending) advertising $$$.
Increasing monetization through new forms of advertising
As part of our goal to improve the monetization of your sites, Google has introduced a number of new features for advertisers, which will directly impact you as an AdSense publisher.
We anticipate that these features will introduce new advertising dollars into the content network by giving advertisers additional ways to reach their objectives.
We're currently testing these new features with a select group of advertisers, and expect to make the features more widely available in the near future.
Site targeting: focusing on the audience
The keyword-targeted ads that you're used to seeing on your pages will now be joined by a new type of site-targeted advertisement. Site-targeted ads allow advertisers to select the specific sites they feel are most appropriate to their campaign, and to run their ads only on those sites.
We believe that advertisers will leverage both our traditional keyword-targeted advertising which runs across the entire AdSense network, and our new site-targeted advertising, bringing more ad dollars to publishers.
CPM bidding: a new way to generate revenue
With site-targeted advertising, advertisers set a maximum CPM bid - that is, the price they are willing to pay for every thousand impressions and pay on a per-impression basis. This means that, unlike pay-per-click ads, you'll earn revenue each time a CPM ad is displayed on your site.
For every eligible impression, both pay-per-impression ads and pay-per-click ads compete in the same auction. Our technology will automatically display the highest performing ads on your pages.
Expanded text ads: testing new formats
We are also running a test with text ads that expand to fill the entire ad unit, so that only a single ad will appear in that unit. At this time, this test will only apply to text ads in a site-targeted campaign and to ad formats banner-sized or larger. The expanded pay-per-impression text ad will have to beat out all of the competing ads before it can appear, so publishers can be assured that any expanded text ad is a highly competitive ad. These ads will be served to any text-enabled ad unit and will abide by your text ad color settings.
More image ads
Because of these new features available for advertisers, the number of image ads in the Google advertising network will grow. To take advantage of these ads, and the increased earnings potential that they offer, we encourage you to review your image ads preference in your AdSense Account Settings page.
You can also choose your image ads preference on a format-by-format basis when generating your ad code. For publishers who want to fully leverage image ads, we now provide an image ads only selection.
Your image ad inventory will also include a small number of Flash ads from a test group of advertisers. These new ads will adhere to the 50KB size limit for image ads, and will be reviewed according to our content guidelines.
Finally, we've added the wide skyscraper (160x600) format to make a total of 5 ad formats supporting image ads. If you're opted in to image ads, be sure to use one of these formats so that we can send image ads to your pages.
Posted by Basileios at 05:12 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
April 18, 2005
A New Member
The new member of Rugles:

Posted by Basileios at 05:11 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
April 08, 2005
What Is Wrong With Google?
I remember the time when Google used to be my favourite engine. I also remember the time when all the other search engines were producing mediocre results. The vision of 'This page cannot be found' messages appearing in the front page of Alta Vista were so common that the switch to Google seemed like a search engine panacea.
But unfortunately these were the days when Google didn't seem to care about money - or at least that was not obvious to us the hoi polloi. Things have changed in Google and it is obvious - and pretty understandable - that these days they are just a business trying to make as much money as possible by caching in from the incredible brand recognition they have gained 5 years ago.
I am somehow shocked though with the fact that there are so few 'anti-Google' statements in the internet world and that so few journalists and professionals mention anything bad against Google.
Over the past few weeks I have been checking in detail the Google Search engine results pages and to say the least there are some very weird things going on. Let me give you a couple of examples:
- The number of 'total documents' for searches of "the" and "a" oscillate wildly between 2.8M and 8M.
- The number of total documents for various searches oscillate between number Y and 2xY.
- There are hundreds of descriptions in the SERPs of Google that correspond to older pages which are totally different to the cached Google pages.
- There are many broken links in the Google results pages.
All these basically indicate that there is something heavily wrong with Google. Google is simply not that interested in the search engine results any more but is pushing all its efforts in their tangential endeavors. This feels as if they are mostly trying to impress the media and continue on their brand name building than actual work on the core project of their success (aka the search engine).
Maybe their tactics is the right one, i am not that smart to predict the future and see what the Google empire will be like in 10-15 years. However, what annoys me is the 'media conspiracy' - in a metaphorical way - in hiding the Google problems. Even in the free and anarchic (yeah right) internet world Google is part of the status quo and not very many people are keen to go against this status.
Posted by Basileios at 05:14 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
April 06, 2005
Google and Yahoo! accused of click fraud collusion
An interesting article from electricnews.net.
Google, Yahoo and other players in the search business have found themselves embroiled in a lawsuit which involves overcharging for pay-per-click e-advertising.
That's according to a report in the Wall Street Journal, which says that plaintiffs in the US filed a lawsuit in February alleging that not only do the likes of Google and Yahoo overcharge advertisers, they collude with each other to continue doing so.
In the pay-per-click model that Google, Yahoo and Ask Jeeves use, advertisers pay each time a user "clicks through" on an ad listed alongside search engine results. Each click costs on average between EUR0.30 and EUR0.50 with more popular keywords costing as much as EUR10 per click.
Led by an Arkansas company called Lane's Gifts and Collectibles, the plaintiffs are looking to have the lawsuit certified as a class action. They allege that the defendants, which include Google, Yahoo, FindWhat, Ask Jeeves, America Online and Look Smart, improperly charged advertisers for what they refer to as incidents of "click fraud."
Click fraud is a growing problem in the search industry. The practice has seen people -- such as competitors or unhappy employees -- repeatedly clicking on a pay-per-click advertisement in order to run up a bill for an advertiser. This issue has the potential to cost advertisers a good deal of money and is difficult to track down.
For their part, the search engines such as Google and Yahoo, have said they have anti-fraud systems in place and that they regularly give advertisers refunds for fraudulent clicks. However, they have failed to give any more detail on the subject, causing some advertisers to worry that the problem is bigger than they are being told.
Click fraud statistics from Sempo, a non-profit association that works to increase awareness and promote the value of search engine marketing, indicate that advertisers are concerned about click fraud but haven't been able to seriously track it. Between 36 percent and 58 percent of advertisers say they're worried about click fraud but haven't been able to track the full extent of it, according to a report by Sempo published in December 2004.
While the majority of the named defendants of the lawsuit have so far declined to comment, Ask Jeeves said in a March regulatory filing that "we intend to defend this lawsuit vigorously."
by Deirdre McArdle
Posted by Basileios at 12:35 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
April 04, 2005
Google: A Behind The Scenes Look
Google: A Behind-the-Scenes Look
Search is one of the most important applications used on the internet and poses some of the most interesting challenges in computer science. Providing high-quality search requires understanding across a wide range of computer science disciplines. In this program, Jeff Dean of Google describes some of these challenges, discusses applications Google has developed, and highlights systems they've built, including GFS, a large-scale distributed file system, and MapReduce, a library for automatic parallelization and distribution of large-scale computation. He also shares some interesting observations derived from Google's web data.
Straight from the University of Washington TV.
Runtime: 55m 36s
Posted by Basileios at 09:52 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack